Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 2;9:714.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00714. eCollection 2019.

Gene Expression Profiling Analysis Reveals Putative Phytochemotherapeutic Target for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Gene Expression Profiling Analysis Reveals Putative Phytochemotherapeutic Target for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Solomon Oladapo Rotimi et al. Front Oncol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among men globally, with castration development resistant contributing significantly to treatment failure and death. By analyzing the differentially expressed genes between castration-induced regression nadir and castration-resistant regrowth of the prostate, we identified soluble guanylate cyclase 1 subunit alpha as biologically significant to driving castration-resistant prostate cancer. A virtual screening of the modeled protein against 242 experimentally-validated anti-prostate cancer phytochemicals revealed potential drug inhibitors. Although, the identified four non-synonymous somatic point mutations of the human soluble guanylate cyclase 1 gene could alter its form and ligand binding ability, our analysis identified compounds that could effectively inhibit the mutants together with wild-type. Of the identified phytochemicals, (8'R)-neochrome and (8'S)-neochrome derived from the Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) showed the highest binding energies against the wild and mutant proteins. Our results identified the neochromes and other phytochemicals as leads in pharmacotherapy and as nutraceuticals in management and prevention of castration-resistance prostate cancers.

Keywords: castration-resistant; gene expression data; phytochemicals; prostate cancer; soluble guanylate cyclase.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Volcano plot of –log10 (p values) vs. log2 fold change. The –log10 (p values) represents the level of significance of each gene while log2 fold change represents the difference between the levels of expression for each gene between the castration-induced regression nadir and castration-resistant regrowth groups.

Similar articles

Cited by 2 articles

References

    1. Zhou CK, Check DP, Lortet-Tieulent J, Laversanne M, Jemal A, Ferlay J, et al. . Prostate cancer incidence in 43 populations worldwide: an analysis of time trends overall and by age group. Int J Cancer. (2016) 138:1388–400. 10.1002/ijc.29894 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Odedina FT, Akinremi TO, Chinegwundoh F, Roberts R, Yu D, Reams RR, et al. . Prostate cancer disparities in Black men of African descent: a comparative literature review of prostate cancer burden among Black men in the United States, Caribbean, United Kingdom, and West Africa. Infect Agent Cancer. (2009) 4(Suppl. 1):S2. 10.1186/1750-9378-4-S1-S2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adeloye D, David RA, Aderemi AV, Iseolorunkanmi A, Oyedokun A, Iweala EE, et al. . An estimate of the incidence of prostate cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. (2016) 11:e0153496 10.1371/journal.pone.0153496 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou Y, Bolton EC, Jones JO. Androgens and androgen receptor signaling in prostate tumorigenesis. J Mol Endocrinol. (2015) 54:R15–29. 10.1530/JME-14-0203 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources