Ojo, Mariane.B. (2011) Successfully Implementing Major Financial Stability Regulatory Reforms: The Risk Weighting Based Controversy (Basel v Dodd Frank) and the Role of National Supervisors. Successfully Implementing Major Financial Stability Regulatory Reforms: The Risk Weighting Based Controversy (Basel v Dodd Frank) and the Role of National Supervisors..
![[img]](http://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
Download (222kB) |
Abstract
As well as a consideration of the role contributed by national supervisors in the successful implementation and enforcement of standards, recommendations and regulations, the significance of clear and unambiguous mandates in enhancing communication between micro prudential supervisors (usually national financial supervisors and central banks) and macro prudential bodies which are responsible for writing the laws that are enforced by micro prudential supervisors, will be highlighted in this paper. This will incorporate a discussion on the advantages and disadvantages inherent in clear, explicit mandates – such a discussion necessitating a distinction between financial stability and monetary policy objectives. Furthermore, the role of credit ratings and their significance in influencing investor choices and judgments, will be considered as a means of highlighting how they contribute to the neglect of risks, exposures attributed to certain financial instruments, and ultimately, systemic risks which de stabilize the financial system.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HG Finance |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Law, Arts and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences |
| Depositing User: | Mr Solomon Bayoko |
| Date Deposited: | 08 Nov 2013 19:24 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Nov 2013 19:24 |
| URI: | http://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/id/eprint/1820 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
